News:
Problems registering, no confirmation email - see http://wiki.scribus.net/canvas/Forums_Registration
Recent posts
#1
Beginner Talk / Re: bad quality prints [white ...
Last post by RodneyLee - Today at 02:52:08 PMreset your printer settings and try again (maybe some kinda "Dithering Mode") causing problems
#2
Beginner Talk / Re: bad quality prints [white ...
Last post by Aleks100 - Today at 12:02:28 PMQuote from: Yosua on Today at 04:29:04 AMFont uploaded there:
https://limewire.com/?referrer=pq7i8xx7p2
Nothing there.
Anyway, in my experience, a bad font can be the source of the problem.
Old TTFs are notorious.
#3
Beginner Talk / Re: bad quality prints [white ...
Last post by AdmFubar - Today at 05:55:42 AMbetter option
do a collect for output, zip that directory and post it here
do a collect for output, zip that directory and post it here
#4
Beginner Talk / Re: bad quality prints [white ...
Last post by Yosua - Today at 04:29:04 AMFont uploaded there:
https://limewire.com/?referrer=pq7i8xx7p2
https://limewire.com/?referrer=pq7i8xx7p2
#5
Beginner Talk / Re: bad quality prints [white ...
Last post by Aleks100 - October 12, 2026, 10:08:30 PMCan you upload one or both of those freeware fonts on some filesharing server so I could check it?
#6
Beginner Talk / Re: bad quality prints [white ...
Last post by Yosua - October 12, 2026, 03:24:43 AMQuotewhere did you get "cdman sym font medium" from?
The font file name is: cdman_pc.ttf
I used it only to print the Compact DISC digital audio symbol, I don't remember from where I downloaded it.
I have just changed the font to print the same symbol, the "OasisCDfont" instead of the "cdman sym font medium". This does change nothing to the printing problem.
Quotewhy embed fonts into a PDF instead of just converting all the text to curves?
Exporting to pdf with converting all to curves also did change nothing.
#7
Layout Issues / Page layout bug? or not?
Last post by Sue Millard - October 11, 2026, 04:27:44 PMI produce an 88 to 100-page magazine twice a year for an animal charity and it is printed from PDF by a commercial printer.
The layout is an A5 booklet. I have set it up using Scribus since 2013.
I upgraded last year to Scribus 1.6.5 Flatpak and I have had real difficulty getting the margins to transfer correctly to the print proof PDF. I intended the inner and outer margins both to be 7mm (very similar to the program's Magazine preset layout). However, when sent to print they became inner 6mm and outside 8mm - and the crop marks "jump" left or right between facing pages.
The only way I've managed to stabilise the crop mark position for the printers is to assume that the "inner" and "outer" text boxes are actually the opposite way round in Master Page Properties and Document Setup.
Ie - in Document setup I have had to set the margins as Inside 6mm and Outside 8mm; and in Master Page Properties I have to set Inside 8mm and Outside 6mm. The result was equal margins as intended and stable crop marks. Phew!
Has anyone else documented this, and is it still a problem in more recent versions?
I have written my own instruction sheet for the next issue...
The layout is an A5 booklet. I have set it up using Scribus since 2013.
I upgraded last year to Scribus 1.6.5 Flatpak and I have had real difficulty getting the margins to transfer correctly to the print proof PDF. I intended the inner and outer margins both to be 7mm (very similar to the program's Magazine preset layout). However, when sent to print they became inner 6mm and outside 8mm - and the crop marks "jump" left or right between facing pages.
The only way I've managed to stabilise the crop mark position for the printers is to assume that the "inner" and "outer" text boxes are actually the opposite way round in Master Page Properties and Document Setup.
Ie - in Document setup I have had to set the margins as Inside 6mm and Outside 8mm; and in Master Page Properties I have to set Inside 8mm and Outside 6mm. The result was equal margins as intended and stable crop marks. Phew!
Has anyone else documented this, and is it still a problem in more recent versions?
I have written my own instruction sheet for the next issue...
#8
General Discussion / Re: End of M$ publisher...
Last post by AdmFubar - October 10, 2026, 12:34:45 AMNot sure where you are going with this.i dont follow what the issue is. It is irrelevant if it is a complete "rewrite". and one can just have the "ai" keep the previous version and add code from there. It can prolly add them ad modules/plugin. I wouldn't be surprised if that is how adobe does it.
#9
General Discussion / Re: End of M$ publisher...
Last post by Nermander - October 09, 2026, 09:09:24 PMThe issue with AI-created clones I think is future development. Instead of incrementally adding features, each version will probably be a complete rewrite.
#10