Scribusoid

Author Topic: Insted moving object freely, it snaps to some strange 1pt grid  (Read 1825 times)

madrifa

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: 0
  • Scribus User
Hi everybody.

Maybe this thread will seem similar to this http://forums.scribus.net/index.php/topic,490.0.html but I report it anyway.

I use Scribus 1.4.3 under Linux, specifically CentOS 6.5 with longterm kernel 3.10.27-1.el6.elrepoNONPAE.i686.

I magnify the document to some high zoom level (at the moment it is 1873% or so) and grab the object (specifically a text frame) by mouse and drag it, but it snaps to some invisible mysterious grid of 1 pt size, while both snapping to grid and snapping to guides is turned off.

In the attachment, there is an example of it. There can be seen the original and the new position of a text frame. When I release the object, it gets moved exactly by 1pt to the right and by 1pt downward, so it's new coordinates are 187.78pt, 399.42pt. As it can be seen, it is a fair 30 by 30 or so pixels away from the original position at this zoom. The reason why I did zoom to so high level was that I wanted to move the object very precisely, not by 1pt steps.

It can be moved by manually entering it's coordinates in the properties box. But not freely by the mose.

Is it a bug in Scribus, or I just misedd something in it's configuration?

I have another question concerning the attached screenshot. In the second (the lower) status bar, there is a gauge showing "100%". What does it mean? I tried to find some information on it, but I did not found anything.

Thanks a lot.

madrifa

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: 0
  • Scribus User
Correction.
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2014, 02:54:32 pm »
Well, maybe the term "snaps to grid" is not the right one. Rather the freehand moving of object has a distance granularity of 1pt in both axes.

When I enter manually some new X coordinate for the object, say 190pt, it is positioned exactly at 190pt horizontally. Then, if I grab it and move it leftward, it follows the 1pt granularity of movements from that new position, and does not snap to the former 0.78pt X-coordinate, but moves to new integer positions: 189.00, 188.00, 187.00, ..etc.

So the term "snapping to grid" is incorrect, it is rather an unwanted granularity in freehand object movements.